Forensic Evidence May Tell the Wrong Story, Accuse the Wrong Person (p2)

in Criminal Defense, on

We are talking about forensic evidence and just how reliable it is. In Raleigh and every other city in the country, just a tiny piece of forensic evidence can lead to or clear criminal charges. The term “forensic evidence” carries a good deal of weight, because it implies that the evidence is based on scientific
Continue Reading Forensic Evidence May Tell the Wrong Story, Accuse the Wrong Person (p2)

Forensic Evidence May Tell the Wrong Story, Accuse the Wrong Person

in Criminal Defense, on

For all of the problems with the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation crime lab, we have seen only a few comments about the accuracy of the lab’s work. We have talked about evidence withheld from defense counsel and reports altered to favor the prosecution; we have talked about a lack of oversight of lab
Continue Reading Forensic Evidence May Tell the Wrong Story, Accuse the Wrong Person

Jurors and Tv-style Forensic Evidence, Continued

in Criminal Defense, on

In our last post, we were talking about the “CSI Effect.” Prosecutors in North Carolina and around the country have complained for a while now that American jurors are so swept up in the high-tech world of television forensics that they expect real-life murder investigations to be just as flashy and complex. Without the fancy
Continue Reading Jurors and Tv-style Forensic Evidence, Continued