Jurors and Tv-style Forensic Evidence, Conclusion

in Criminal Defense, on

We’ve been discussing the “CSI Effect” — that is, the strongly held belief that jurors are so accustomed to television’s forensic acrobatics that they expect real-life prosecutors to present the same type of evidence. Criminal defense attorneys from Raleigh to Portland believe juries are smarter than that, and a recent study confirmed that belief. It’s
Continue Reading Jurors and Tv-style Forensic Evidence, Conclusion

Jurors and Tv-style Forensic Evidence, Continued

in Criminal Defense, on

In our last post, we were talking about the “CSI Effect.” Prosecutors in North Carolina and around the country have complained for a while now that American jurors are so swept up in the high-tech world of television forensics that they expect real-life murder investigations to be just as flashy and complex. Without the fancy
Continue Reading Jurors and Tv-style Forensic Evidence, Continued

Jurors Are Demanding Tv-style Forensic Evidence – or Are They?

in Criminal Defense, on

Debates about forensic evidence are not new in North Carolina. For a while last year, it seemed you couldn’t pick up a paper without seeing a story about the problems at the state crime lab and the State Bureau of Investigation. A major concern for defense attorneys was the cozy relationship between the forensic scientists
Continue Reading Jurors Are Demanding Tv-style Forensic Evidence – or Are They?